« Small Grand Tour | Main | »

August 08, 2007

I am not pleased

londonlite.jpg

How can anyone with more than two brain cells put up with these stupid tabloids in this country!!?? I was coming back home and, on the tube, every single evening newspaper being read by the passengers featured stories like the one pictured above. I honestly almost felt like snatching the papers aways from my co-travelers hands and give them a lecture on the portuguese criminal and judicial system! (I'm developing a theory: the longest time away from the home land, the more patriotic one becomes).

Basically, these moronic people who call themselves journalists are using the claim of a Portuguese convicted murderess that the Portuguese police - the same inspector in charge of Madeleine McCann's case- framed her in the case of her missing daughter and might be doing the same to the missing brit kid's mother.

On this blog it was better refuted than I would ever be able to, so I'm pasting most of the entry here:

1 – Joana Cipriano vanished from a small place 10 km in the outskirts of Portimão. Last time somebody saw her, she was on her way to a local groceries shop;
2 - Her mother, Leonor Cipriano, only reported to Police her daughter has disappeared two days after;
3 – After a long and difficult investigation, headed by Chief-Inspector Gonçalo Amaral, Leonor Cipriano and her brother were accused of murdering the eight years old child;
4 – The body of Joana Cipriano was never found, but samples of her blood were found in her mother refrigerator;
5 – Her mother justified those samples of blood admitting she had beaten Joana, for some reason, she was hurt and she bleeded from her nose;
6 – Leonor Cipriano and her brother, who had a incestuous relationship, were sentenced to 16 years in jail, for the murder of her daughter and niece;
7 – Before the trial, Leonor Cipriano accused five CID officers of beating her, trying to extract a confession. She named the five CID officers, and included Chief-Inspector Gonçalo ("Amaral Lector", according to British tabloids…);
8 – The Public Prosecutor’s Office opened a criminal investigation and ordered a police line-up, with the CID officers named and accused by Leonor Cipriano of beating her;
9 – The line-up took place with Leonor Cipriano behind a two-way mirror and she couldn’t recognize any of the aggressors;
10 – The Public Prosecutor’s Office magistrate that was in charge of the criminal investigation decided to accuse the five CID officers, but didn’t mentioned, in the accusation sent to the Court, that Leonor Cipriano couldn’t identify any of the aggressors, in the police line-up;
11 – Leonor Cipriano never confessed the murder of her own daughter. Her brother, in a letter written from jail, accused Leonor Cipriano of selling her daughter;
12 – Police is convinced (and the jurors at the trial found enough evidence to pass a verdict of guilty) that Leonor Cipriano and her brother were found, by Joana, having sexual relations, when she came home, back from the groceries shop. As Leonor Cipriano had a lover, at the time, they were afraid she would tell him what she saw;
13 – So, they beat her, in order to frighten her and keep her mouth shut up;
14 – Perhaps accidentally, they beat her so violently that they killed her. So, they decided to get rid of he body and cut it in pieces, keeping some of them in the freezer, while they gave the other pieces to be eaten by pigs (this is what police believes is the strongest possibility, because there was no other trace of Joana Cipriano, unless the blood samples in her mother freezer…)
15 – The body of Joana Cipriano was never found.

And so, here we have a terrible story of a dysfunctional family, a child murdered and a very difficult police investigation. The only thing – in my humble opinion - that has some similarity with Madeleine McCann disappearance is the fact that the person in charge of Madeleine’s case is the same that successfully headed Joana Cipriano investigation: CID Chief-Inspector Gonçalo Amaral. And success, in Joana’s case, is clear: the murderers were found, accused, went to court, they were sentenced, they appealed the sentence and the Portuguese Supreme Court reduced it to 16 years of jail to both of them – the mother, Leonor Cipriano and her brother, for the murder her daughter and nice, eight year old Joana Cipriano.

If many "consumers" of British Media have another idea, that’s because most British journalists covering Madeleine McCann abduction strongly believe that truth never should be allowed to "kill" a good story. Even if I means destroying the reputation of an experienced CID Chief-Inspector. "And what’s the problem?" – I imagine my British colleagues asking themselves this question, with a pint of Guinness in the hand, enjoying the sunshine at Praia da Luz. "The guy isn’t even British, he’s just a Portuguese…"

*****
PS: May I just add that if there are people in my country that work hard no matter how apalling the conditions they face those are the men and women in the Police forces with whom I had the privilege to work with. Smartest and most dedicated civil servants I have ever worked with on my consulting days.

Posted by claudia

Comments

I would like to thank you for your information. I am an American living in Sweden and I have been checking into this other story as I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. It has been difficult in this case, I must admit. Getting accurate information is nearly impossible as well. I must say that my young son and I went over and over the information we had in the beginning and came to the same conclusion that the Police must've come to some time later. We suspected an accidental death of some kind-whether it was from plain neglect to dicipline gone out of hand or even a case of a fall in the bathroom. We believed the parents were involved in some way. I find that I would like to give them the benefit to believe there was mere panic and prehaps even sheer hysteria but if it was that...I cannot understand why the Mother did not take the deal offered by the police. What are your thoughts about why she didn't? I mean, I would've taken that deal. Am I missing something-Prehaps a cultural thig? I have heard talk here in Sweden that it is to hope to save face but it doesn't add up for me. Why didn't she take the deal? Did she think she could get away with it? The only reason I wouldn't take that deal is if I didn't do it-But maybe that is just me. Thanks for your insight, Kimberly Whiteside Olsson.

Posted by Kimberly at September 14, 2007 11:37 PM

who made the bookings for all the english FAM???? who told who, who was coming with a lot of little children????

Posted by elisabeth at September 15, 2007 09:18 AM

Thank you for posting the real reason behind the ex chief of police in portugal, i am a member on a crime board and agree completelly with your opinions on the british press and their critism of this man. Its so unfair how the british press have literally crucified him, if only he had remained and maybe this whole mess would have been solved already. People forget that the real victim is madeleine.

Posted by seashell at November 1, 2007 07:58 PM

Comment




Remember you?

(pode usar HTML tags)